Union Berlin Appeals Firecracker Incident to Arbitration Court

Wed 26th Mar, 2025

Union Berlin is escalating its dispute with VfL Bochum regarding the outcome of their recent Bundesliga match, which ended under controversial circumstances. The club has now brought its case before the Permanent Arbitration Court following two previous legal setbacks. This move aims to overturn the decisions made by the German Football Association's (DFB) Federal Court and the DFB Sports Court regarding the match played on the 14th matchday.

The match, which concluded in a 1-1 draw, was marred by an incident where a spectator threw a lighter at Bochum's goalkeeper, Patrick Drewes, causing a significant delay. In a surprising turn of events, both teams agreed to a mutual non-aggression pact as the game neared its conclusion. Subsequently, the DFB Federal Court upheld a decision to retroactively award the match to Bochum with a 2-0 victory, leading to Union Berlin's decision to pursue further legal action.

The Permanent Arbitration Court serves as the ultimate authority for disputes between professional clubs and the DFB or the German Football League (DFL). The ruling from this court holds substantial implications for both Union Berlin and VfL Bochum, as both teams are currently embroiled in a fierce relegation battle and are in desperate need of points.

Union Berlin had previously expressed its intention to file this appeal in a timely manner. According to reports, the Arbitration Court is expected to expedite its decision, aiming to provide clarity on the situation before the current season concludes.

In the aftermath of the DFB Federal Court's ruling, Union Berlin voiced strong criticisms, suggesting that the court was pressured to send a political message on behalf of VfL Bochum and the Control Committee. The club accused the court of improperly applying legal and procedural standards.

Furthermore, Union Berlin is exploring possible civil legal avenues in response to the situation, indicating their determination to challenge the rulings they believe to be unfair.


More Quick Read Articles »