Trial Begins in Munich Over Deadly Attack: Defendant Remains Silent, Makes Symbolic Gesture

The trial concerning last year's fatal vehicle attack near a Munich courthouse has commenced under heightened security and significant media attention. The accused, a 25-year-old man, is facing charges relating to a deadly incident that occurred during a demonstration organized by the Verdi union, which drew approximately 1,400 participants.

According to court proceedings, the accused drove a white van into the crowd, striking several individuals. Among the initial victims were a two-year-old child in a stroller and her mother, both of whom sustained severe injuries and died shortly thereafter. In total, more than 40 people were injured, with several suffering life-threatening harm. Numerous survivors are participating in the trial as co-plaintiffs and were present for the initial hearing.

The prosecution alleges that the defendant engaged in the attack deliberately, motivated by extremist ideology. Evidence presented indicates that the individual, who arrived in Germany in 2016, had been influenced by radical content from religious leaders through social media. This exposure is said to have contributed to the development of hostile attitudes toward Western countries, which he allegedly held responsible for the suffering of Muslim populations in Afghanistan and the broader Middle East.

Court documents state that the defendant decided to target people at random in Germany as a form of retribution. The prosecution believes that a combination of radicalization, personal discontent, and emotional distress fueled the decision to carry out the attack. The charges include two counts of murder and 44 counts of attempted murder, with investigators citing the suspect's actions and statements following the incident as evidence of intent.

Throughout the proceedings, the defendant has chosen not to address the court regarding the charges or his personal circumstances. During the opening session, he repeatedly raised his index finger, a gesture commonly recognized as a symbol of monotheistic belief within Islamic communities, but which has also been associated with extremist groups. The defendant kept his face obscured from cameras by holding a folder in front of him.

The trial has drawn considerable public and media interest, with long lines observed at security checkpoints outside the courtroom. Due to these measures, the first hearing was delayed, but after the charges were formally presented, the session concluded promptly. The court has scheduled further hearings to reconstruct the events and gather evidence, with proceedings expected to continue into the summer. A verdict is anticipated by late June.

The date of February 13 will mark one year since the attack, and the presiding judge has indicated that no testimonies from affected parties will be taken on that day, allowing them to attend commemorative events. The case is being closely watched as it highlights ongoing concerns regarding the threat of extremist violence and the challenges faced by authorities in preventing such incidents.