Banksy Artwork Causes Headaches for Homeowners in Lowestoft

Mon 19th May, 2025

A large-scale mural by the elusive street artist Banksy has become a source of frustration for the owners of a house in Lowestoft, England. Initially viewed as a fortunate surprise, the artwork has since transformed into a considerable burden for the homeowners.

In August 2021, Banksy created a striking image of an oversized seagull poised to dive on a dumpster, painting it on the exterior of a home in the coastal town. This piece, estimated to be valued at around EUR3.57 million (£3 million), was an unexpected addition to the property, leaving the owners, Gert and Garry Coutts, initially thrilled.

However, their excitement was short-lived. Garry Coutts has expressed feelings of distress regarding the situation, stating that the joy of having a Banksy mural has been overshadowed by problems stemming from its presence. The artwork has attracted numerous visitors to the area, but this surge in foot traffic has also led to complications, including an attempted theft of a portion of the mural. In response, the Coutts family felt compelled to hire a night watchman to safeguard the piece.

The local council expressed interest in designating the artwork as a protected monument, but the maintenance costs would have been prohibitively high, estimated at £40,000 annually. Faced with these financial burdens, the Coutts family opted to remove the mural entirely. They made the decision to detach the 16-ton section of the wall that held the artwork, incurring costs of approximately EUR475,000 (£400,000), which involved securing a loan from one of the co-owners.

Since the artwork's removal, the Coutts family has sought to sell the piece through auction houses; however, their efforts have been met with refusal. As a result, they have been left with ongoing expenses related to storing the mural, costing them around EUR3,560 (£3,000) each month.

The situation has left the homeowners feeling increasingly frustrated. They have pointed fingers at Banksy, suggesting that his actions were thoughtless, causing them significant hardship. While Banksy might suggest that the property owners could simply paint over the mural if they no longer wished to keep it, the owners fear public backlash against such a decision, citing the potential outrage over altering a piece of artwork that many consider extraordinary.

The Coutts family finds themselves in a difficult position, feeling trapped by the implications of the artwork on their property and the financial strain it has introduced. Their experience highlights the complex relationship between street art, property ownership, and the unexpected consequences that can arise when art intersects with real estate.


More Quick Read Articles »