Understanding Voter Motivations in AfD Strongholds

In the recent 2025 federal elections, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party made significant gains, particularly in various constituencies where they emerged as a leading political force. Despite the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) winning the overall election, the AfD's increased share of votes reflects a growing sentiment of dissatisfaction among voters towards traditional parties.

The results indicate a complex tapestry of motivations driving voters in regions where the AfD thrived. In many eastern states, the party garnered overwhelming support, achieving more than 70% of votes in some districts, such as the small municipality of Wrangelsburg in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Here, local leaders expressed a willingness to engage with the AfD, suggesting that their rise might be an opportunity for change rather than a cause for alarm.

The mayor of Wrangelsburg noted that the community does not identify as extreme right, emphasizing a desire to give the AfD a chance in governance. This sentiment is echoed by some constituents who feel that their voices have been neglected by established parties. However, there are also residents who express concern about the implications of such a political shift, highlighting the growing discontent among voters.

In Dresden-Gorbitz, a district where nearly 60% of voters chose the AfD, the election results were seen as a protest against the status quo. Many citizens articulated feelings of hopelessness regarding the current government's ability to address their concerns. This sentiment of disenchantment is prevalent across multiple locations, indicating a broader trend of seeking alternatives to traditional political platforms.

Brandenburg's town of Ortrand exhibited a similar dynamic, where over half of the electorate voted for the AfD. Residents here cited concerns about immigration and economic stability as pivotal issues influencing their choices. Interestingly, despite the area's relatively low unemployment rates and a small foreign population, fears about potential changes in societal dynamics are driving support for the party.

Conversely, not all voters in these regions align with the AfD. In Ortrand, a notable portion of the electorate opted for leftist parties as a form of resistance against the AfD's rise. Some residents articulated their rationale for voting against the AfD, arguing that the party's agenda primarily serves affluent individuals and is disconnected from the needs of the broader population.

In Schleswig-Holstein, the AfD emerged as a significant player, positioning itself as the third strongest party in certain municipalities. Local leaders expressed confusion over the rise of the AfD, attributing it to concerns about economic issues, including the perceived neglect of local communities in favor of international considerations.

In areas like Mettenhof, a district in Kiel characterized by high immigration and socioeconomic challenges, the AfD found unexpected support. Residents indicated that frustrations over local conditions and perceived threats from immigration have led some to view the AfD as a viable alternative.

This rise in support for the AfD is not merely a regional phenomenon confined to the eastern states but is also evident in parts of the western regions of Germany. The varied responses from voters highlight an intricate relationship with the party, often rooted in personal experiences and local issues rather than a blanket endorsement of its entire platform.

The 2025 elections have underscored the importance of understanding voter motivations, particularly in areas where traditional parties are losing ground. As political dynamics shift, the AfD's ability to resonate with specific demographics will continue to shape Germany's political landscape moving forward.