Enhancing Quality Assessment in Healthcare by Incorporating Patient Experiences

Quality healthcare is a primary concern for everyone, yet defining and measuring quality remains complex. While factors such as waiting times for home care, medical supervision in nursing homes, and regular medication checks are critical, they do not fully encapsulate the essence of quality in healthcare.

Randi Olsson Haave, an assistant professor and doctoral researcher at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in Gjøvik, emphasizes the limitations of current quality assessments. Her research focuses on the experiences of patients within municipal health and care services, revealing that the human element of care significantly influences perceived quality.

In her studies, Haave found that many individuals receiving care expressed a desire to be recognized and treated as individuals. One nursing home resident poignantly shared her feelings about the importance of personal connection with caregivers: the emotional impact of being acknowledged can significantly affect their well-being.

Haave's findings highlight the necessity of interpersonal relationships in healthcare settings. Many residents reported that caregivers who offered attention and understanding helped them feel secure and able to manage daily challenges. The positive interactions with caregivers were sometimes described metaphorically as 'rays of sunshine,' indicating the profound effect these relationships have on patients' mental and emotional health.

Despite an established framework requiring municipalities to report on 32 different quality indicators for over a decade, a significant knowledge gap remains regarding the quality of health and care services provided. Haave points out that while general consensus exists on the need for effective quality monitoring, there is still considerable uncertainty about how best to achieve this.

Quality indicators, as defined by the Norwegian Directorate of Health, serve as indirect measures that reflect the quality of services. For example, one indicator assesses the duration from the decision to provide home care services to the actual delivery of those services. However, Haave notes that these indicators do not adequately capture patient experiences or satisfaction levels.

There remains a lack of systematic feedback mechanisms to gather insights from those receiving care. While municipalities are obligated to collect feedback from residents and their families, the methods employed, such as mailed questionnaires, often yield low response rates due to accessibility issues faced by many individuals requiring assistance. This lack of engagement undermines the effectiveness of quality measurements.

Haave advocates for a more comprehensive approach to assess healthcare quality, suggesting that new methods be developed to better document the actual experiences of those receiving care. She acknowledges that while quality indicators provide essential frameworks and goals for healthcare professionals, they fall short in offering a complete picture of care quality.

Her recommendations call for a greater emphasis on the qualitative aspects of healthcare experiences. By focusing on the human elements of care, stakeholders can gain a deeper understanding of what constitutes quality care from the patients' perspectives. This shift in focus could lead to improved healthcare practices that prioritize the needs and experiences of patients.

Haave's research findings, published in reputable journals such as the Journal of Clinical Nursing and the International Journal of Nursing Studies, signal a critical need for evolving quality assessment frameworks within healthcare systems to incorporate the voices of those they serve.