The trial surrounding the death of a university student from Aschau in Oberbayern has entered a new phase, as a former cellmate has again offered critical testimony against the primary suspect at the Traunstein District Court.

According to statements heard in court, the former inmate alleged that the accused, during a period of pre-trial detention in late 2022, confessed to rendering the student unconscious before placing her into the Prien River. The two men reportedly met while both were incarcerated, and the ex-inmate's account has become a centerpiece in the prosecution's case.

Background of the Case

The case gained widespread attention in 2022 when the 23-year-old student failed to return home after a night out at a local nightclub. She was last seen at the 'Eiskeller' club in Aschau during the early hours, but did not arrive at her residence. Her body was later found in the river Prien during the afternoon, prompting a detailed investigation into the circumstances surrounding her death.

Initial Verdict and Legal Developments

Initially, the accused was convicted in 2024 and sentenced to nine years under juvenile law, largely based on the testimony of the former cellmate, who served as the prosecution's main witness. However, the credibility of this witness was later questioned by the court, and the defendant was released in June after the verdict was overturned by the Federal Court of Justice. The higher court cited procedural errors, particularly regarding a defense motion to recuse the presiding judge, as reasons for nullifying the original judgment.

Current Proceedings and Testimonies

The retrial, which began at the end of September, is expected to run for 26 days. The court is re-examining all evidence, with particular attention to the renewed statements by the former cellmate. While the prosecution maintains that the student was attacked from behind and subsequently drowned, allegedly motivated by sexual intent, the defense continues to argue that the events were accidental and not the result of deliberate harm.

Key Points of Contention

The prosecution's case relies on circumstantial evidence and the repeated account of the former inmate, who claims the accused admitted to the crime. However, the defense challenges the reliability of this testimony, citing previous judicial assessments that cast doubt on the witness's credibility. The court is considering all available forensic evidence, witness testimonies, and procedural aspects to ensure a comprehensive review of the case.

The retrial's outcome is anticipated later this year, with a verdict expected just before the holiday season. The proceedings remain closely watched, given the high-profile nature of the case and its implications for the regional legal system.

Ongoing Investigation

Authorities continue to scrutinize the events of the night in question, while both prosecution and defense present their interpretations of the evidence. The final judgment will depend on the court's evaluation of all testimonies and the overall coherence of the prosecution's argument against the standard of proof required in criminal proceedings.