Court Hears Forensic Details in Case of Eight-Year-Old Fabian's Death

The trial surrounding the death of eight-year-old Fabian in Rostock has entered a critical stage, with the latest court session focusing on forensic findings and investigative details. The court heard expert testimony regarding the cause of death and examined evidence linked to the accused, Gina H.

A forensic pathologist presented an autopsy report, confirming that the child died as a result of six severe stab wounds, leading to fatal blood loss. The forensic examination found internal bleeding, with no significant external blood traces at the scene. No defensive injuries were identified, suggesting the victim was unable to resist the attack.

The investigation also included analysis by a fire expert, who detected traces of an accelerant at the location where Fabian's body was discovered. A chemical specialist reported similarities between the substance found at the scene and a commercially available grill lighter recovered from the carport of the accused. Notably, a substantial amount--between 500 and 600 milliliters--was missing from the bottle, raising questions about its possible use during the incident.

Further complexity was added by the presentation of recorded telephone conversations involving Gina H. These calls, dated 17 and 18 October 2025, captured her discussing concerns about potential evidence in her vehicle, specifically referencing the accelerant and floor mats. The timing of these conversations is significant, as they occurred before the public had knowledge of the fire at the crime scene, suggesting prior awareness on the part of the accused.

During the proceedings, the defense questioned whether the physical force required for such an act would more likely be attributed to a male perpetrator. The forensic expert responded that, while significant strength was necessary, the act could theoretically be committed by any individual not suffering from severe physical impairment. The expert illustrated this by referencing a test involving a blunt instrument, highlighting that determination, rather than physical stature alone, played a crucial role.

The prosecution summarized interim findings, noting that while six forceful stab wounds were confirmed, the lack of external blood at the scene was consistent with the pathologist's assessment of internal bleeding. The exact duration of the fire could not be determined with certainty based on the available forensic evidence.

The role of the grill lighter remained a central point. The investigative team emphasized that its presence and the missing contents could not be overlooked, especially given references to the product in monitored phone conversations. In those calls, Gina H. expressed concern about the possible discovery of the accelerant or related traces in her car and mentioned her anxiety about being held responsible for the incident.

Legal representatives for the victim's family highlighted the forensic expert's position that it was plausible for a woman to have committed the offense, based on the physical evidence. The defense, however, maintained that the expert's statements indicated only a possibility and did not constitute definitive proof regarding the identity of the perpetrator. The defense also argued that the accused's prior knowledge of the fire did not necessarily establish culpability, noting that she was among those who discovered the body and was aware of the state in which it was found.

The court session concluded with confirmation that the trial would resume on 9 June, as the legal process continues to address the complex circumstances of Fabian's death.