Are CT Scans Contributing to a Future Increase in Cancer Rates?

Sun 20th Apr, 2025

Computed tomography (CT) scans are integral to modern medical diagnostics, providing healthcare professionals with rapid and detailed images of patients' internal structures. These scans are pivotal for diagnosing conditions such as cancer, strokes, and internal injuries. However, a recent study published in JAMA Internal Medicine raises concerns about the potential long-term effects of increased CT scan usage, suggesting they may contribute to a rise in cancer cases.

The study estimates that the number of CT scans performed in the United States in 2023 could lead to over 100,000 additional cancer diagnoses. If current scanning trends persist, researchers project that CT scans might account for approximately 5% of all new cancer cases annually. This alarming statistic comes in light of a significant rise in CT scan procedures, with a reported 30% increase over the past decade; in 2023 alone, an estimated 93 million scans were conducted on around 62 million individuals.

While the risk associated with a single CT scan is generally low, it is not negligible. Younger patients, particularly children and teenagers, exhibit heightened vulnerability due to their developing bodies. Damage from ionizing radiation may not manifest until many years later, making it crucial to consider the risks associated with scans in this demographic. Nevertheless, over 90% of CT scans are performed on adults, who collectively face a greater overall risk. Common types of cancer linked to CT exposure include lung, colon, bladder cancers, and leukemia, with breast cancer also being a significant concern for women.

What is particularly striking about this latest analysis is the dramatic increase in the projected number of future cancers linked to CT scans compared to previous estimates. A similar study conducted in 2009 projected around 29,000 future cancers associated with these scans. The current figure is more than three times higher, attributed to a combination of increased scanning frequency and advancements in research that allow for more precise assessments of radiation exposure to specific organs.

The study offers a compelling comparison: if scanning rates remain constant, cancers related to CT exposure could rival those caused by well-known risk factors such as alcohol consumption and obesity.

Not all CT scans present the same level of risk. In adults, scans targeting the abdomen and pelvis are believed to pose the greatest risk for future cancer development. For pediatric patients, particularly infants under one year of age, head CT scans are of particular concern.

Despite these potential risks, medical professionals emphasize the life-saving benefits of CT scans. They are critical in early disease detection, treatment planning, and emergency care. The challenge lies in ensuring that these scans are only utilized when absolutely necessary.

Emerging technologies offer promising alternatives to mitigate risk. For instance, photon-counting CT scanners use lower radiation doses, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not involve radiation at all. The researchers advocate for improved diagnostic protocols to help clinicians determine when a CT scan is essential and when a safer option like an MRI or ultrasound may suffice.

It is important to clarify that the findings of this study do not establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship between CT scans and individual cancer cases. The estimates are based on statistical models rather than direct evidence linking scans to cancer. The American College of Radiology notes that no research has definitively connected CT scans to cancer risk in humans, even after repeated exposures.

Nonetheless, the established science indicating that radiation can contribute to cancer development is well-founded. Given the high volume of scans performed, even minimal risks can accumulate over time. While CT scans are invaluable in saving lives, they are not without risk. As the field of medical technology advances, so too must our approach to its application. By reducing unnecessary scans, opting for safer alternatives where appropriate, and minimizing radiation exposure, healthcare providers can continue to harness the benefits of CT technology while safeguarding public health.


More Quick Read Articles »