Trump Envoy Proposes Controversial Division of Ukraine: A Post-War Berlin Parallel
In the ongoing geopolitical landscape, discussions surrounding a resolution to the Ukraine conflict are intensifying. A notable proposal has emerged from Keith Kellogg, the U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine, suggesting a possible division of Ukraine reminiscent of the post-World War II partition of Berlin. This strategy aims to bring forth a ceasefire amid the ongoing hostilities, although its acceptance remains uncertain.
As the war continues, the U.S. administration under Donald Trump is exploring various avenues to facilitate peace. However, frustrations are mounting, particularly as Russian President Vladimir Putin has not signaled any willingness to accept U.S. proposals for a ceasefire. This impasse was evident during a recent visit of U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff to Moscow, which failed to yield any substantial progress.
Kellogg, in an interview, proposed a unique approach to the conflict's resolution by suggesting the establishment of three distinct zones within Ukraine. According to his plan, Russia would maintain control over the occupied eastern territories and Crimea, while Ukraine would govern the northeastern region adjacent to the Dnipro River. Furthermore, a coalition of British and French forces would oversee the western part of the country, effectively creating a buffer zone.
The Dnipro River would serve as a significant geographical barrier for Russian forces, aimed at minimizing provocations. To further prevent direct confrontations, Kellogg suggested the creation of a demilitarized zone spanning 30 kilometers to separate the Ukrainian and Russian territories, despite acknowledging the likelihood of violations of any ceasefire agreement.
Kellogg drew parallels between his proposed arrangement and the division of Berlin after World War II, where the city was segmented into zones controlled by various international powers. However, it remains to be seen whether this plan would garner support from Russia and Ukraine, particularly given Putin's previous statements rejecting the presence of NATO peacekeeping forces in Ukraine. Nevertheless, both France and the United Kingdom have expressed their intent to continue supporting Ukraine post-conflict.
There are concerns about the feasibility of Kellogg's proposal, especially in light of Russia's previous plans that aimed for a complete takeover of Ukraine, which were made public late last year. Despite the complexities surrounding this issue, Kellogg's suggestion of a Berlin-like division of Ukraine could potentially align with Putin's ongoing narrative of 'denazifying' Ukraine.
Moreover, Kellogg emphasized that any division of Ukraine should not mirror the historical context of Berlin's partition, advocating instead for a supportive role of allied troops to reinforce Ukraine's sovereignty without direct U.S. military involvement. This nuanced stance indicates a desire to establish a framework for stability rather than a straightforward territorial division.
In light of these discussions, Trump remains committed to advancing a peace plan for Ukraine, highlighting the urgent need for resolution as casualties mount in the ongoing conflict. His remarks on social media platforms underscore the critical nature of the situation, urging for immediate action to halt the violence.
As diplomatic efforts continue, the international community watches closely to see how these proposals will evolve and whether they can pave the way for a lasting peace in the region.